Many people confuse in the working world of Human resources with the world of art. The art world is considered closer to the world of entertainment-oriented sheer pleasure. Meanwhile, the world of work is a serious world, where more efforts focused on the achievement of targets and money. Is this true? When the famous singer Annie Lenox seniors interviewed, he said that his success is a source of very hard work. His parents bequeath wooden shipbuilders hard work ethic. That's why he never left the rigid manner in regulating the time, practice, and prepare their show. The artist was famous in this country it was doing the same thing. Performance in a dazzling stage is the result of hard work that are not playful. So, what's the difference between artists and cultural with the CEO, lawyer, stockbroker or a scientist?
If we look deeper in the dimension of Human resources, a lot of things we can learn from these two worlds are different as well: business and art. An artist may have a quirky look, paint the hair and let his hair longish. However, what we need to understand is that the artist also has a certain quality targets and achieve success with ease. The corporate manager did appear more serious, as demanded by the most short-term results. However, we also know that to succeed in the business world can not be done by relying on the ingenuity and engineering skill or hardskills alone, but is influenced competence "softskills" that relies on "art", as the art of building relationships, managing people. Many people are successful as a businessman, a financial expert, expert negotiations, without whom the qualities of a successful leader. Why is that? Because leadership is an art.
Artistic charisma of a leader
Have we listened to great artists such as Bon Jovi similarity to Sting with such a great leader of Kennedy? Would not they know we can have a dazzling charisma community to the point that they could be such a fanatic with him? Audience response to the work of an artist with the response to the leader he admires. Clothes, objects it has, as it were sacred, and is considered to contain the power. What special quality attached to such a charismatic leader? Admiration society on these two characters is so strong, because the reason is clear, namely competence. Both have the ability arrange orchestra various strengths and create a relationship of mutual respect between the leader and role model, who can not be separated from the fascination with leadership skills. This situation is definitely caused by the force of the 'genuine' present in the leader. These two figures are very socially oriented, they carry a challenge, amaze, calming and motivating. His vision ahead, big, strong, and about the world, ourselves and our choices.
Another quality of a leader is super important is the consistency of his beliefs. Consistency will of a leader seen by peers as a focus and can be read easily by all adherents. All strategies, 'policy' and the structure of governance and the need to completely and thoroughly communicated. Despite having to deal with a high level of complexity, it is full of imagination and a "sense of humor". He also should be free of the desire to 'ja-im', think or worry about yourself, or even their own pockets, so as "selfless". When the science of management stage of an artist often analyzed from the communication with the audience, then this also needs to be applied to a leader. Leaders must check whether the communication eye to eye, heart to heart and even two-way? Is the relationship as close and inseparable? When the management of an artist reminded stage for a gig like this is the first and last chance, as there will be no opportunity to repeat the show again. A leader also actually need to be reminded also to capitalize on any momentum to interact seriously and carefully, and all out. As a leader, have we tried to embrace the community and look deeply into what they need?
Principle Creative Leaders
A successful leader, certainly knows how to move 'passion' it to work, concept and vision, to the management and administrative regularity. The balance between the future and the present, creative and administrative work, has mastered well, even limitless. Creative responses more agile leader and is 'real time', flexible to changes in 'last minute'. Leaders also need to be posted 'benchmark' artist in making the correction and see errors as a trigger for improvement. The way the artist see failure usually more 'tough' than a leader, because the artist will soon accuse him less exercise and whack him for better, when it fails.
We can imitate also flexibility for artists to collaborate. Artists used to call 'group show' with other groups, though different genre. Even with its competitors even easier collaboration. Would that, in an age of co-opetition like this, but we competed well to colaborate. It was not his day was also a leader can not speak. At present, there is no performance artist who blushed embarrassed when asked to speak in public. He must grasp this opportunity as a golden opportunity to attract more sympathy. What is also important is that the artist is easier to learn than others. Every time someone plays a musical instrument, which is not uncommon, usually another artist simply asking a series of questions that 'curious'. As leaders are we still mad mad respect and rank? Have we check whether we have the artistic leadership qualities?
0 comments:
Post a Comment